top of page
AI RESONANCE TRACKER

Why the Institute exists

For most of history, changing what a large number of people believe was slow, expensive, and visible. You could see the newspaper, the pulpit, the campaign. Artificial intelligence has removed all three constraints at once. Belief can now be shaped quickly, cheaply, and without leaving a mark. The people who build these systems understand what they do. The people affected by them mostly don't. That distance has a name in our work: the persuasion asymmetry. The Institute exists to narrow it, not by telling people what to think, but by giving them the means to see how their thinking is being acted upon. The evidence is already unsettling. Nightingale and Farid (2022) found that AI-synthesised faces are rated as more trustworthy than real ones. When a fabricated signal outperforms a genuine one, trust stops being something earned and becomes something manufactured. We call that synthetic trust, and it is the central problem of the decade we're in.

Our work

Six arms, one purpose: understand influence, then make it legible to the people it acts on.

Independent reporting and long-form conversation on AI, persuasion, and information integrity. The Institute's public voice.

The publishing imprint. Books and long-form work that hold ideas at the length they deserve.

Empirical study of how belief forms under synthetic conditions, built on cross-national experimental work.

Teaching for the people who most need this literacy: policymakers, communicators, students, and the public.

A convened group of advisors from research, policy, and practice who guide the Institute's direction.

Small, off-the-record sessions that bring the field into the same room.

The ideas

The Institute works with a small set of defined concepts. They exist because the ordinary words for this — misinformation, manipulation, bias — are too blunt to describe what's actually happening.

The Persuasion Asymmetry.

The gap between those who design influence systems and those affected by them.

Synthetic Trust.

Trust produced by systems built to simulate trustworthiness rather than earn it.

Cultural Truth.

What a community accepts as true because it resonates, regardless of whether it's accurate.

AI Belief Velocity.

The speed at which conviction now forms, once the time between exposure and belief collapses.

Get involved

The Institute works with researchers, journalists, funders, and institutions who take this problem seriously. If that's you, there's a way in.

PEOPLE

Christina Mendel

Research Director

Christina Mendel founded the Institute and leads its research and editorial direction. She is a registered European Commission AI expert and a member of the Forbes Communications Council, and has lectured at the University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland (FHNW) at master\'s level since 2020. Her experimental work on persuasion and synthetic trust, drawn from a cross-national pilot study of 2,200 participants across the United States and European Union, has been presented at ETH Zurich and to the Gallup International Association.

The Council

Being convened.

bottom of page